Oksana Grigorieva demands money from Gibson for her own PR
Oksana Grigorieva demands money from Gibson for her own PR

Video: Oksana Grigorieva demands money from Gibson for her own PR

Video: Oksana Grigorieva demands money from Gibson for her own PR
Video: Mel Gibson's Ex Oksana Grigorieva Loses $500,000 In Settlement Deal For Speaking Out on Howard St… 2024, November
Anonim
Image
Image

A new, rather unexpected turn in the scandal between Hollywood actor Mel Gibson and pianist Oksana Grigorieva. Oksana, who, according to the press, remained aground after the start of the court proceedings, decided to pay off her PR specialists at the expense of the star. Unfortunately, Gibson's representatives have not yet commented on the situation.

PR agents who have helped Grigorieva since the beginning of her family scandal are asking $ 84,000 for the services rendered. According to the TMZ.com portal, Grigorieva is sure that Gibson should pay her expenses, which she asked the judges.

As the newspaper writes, Oksana said that she hired assistants who helped her maintain her image, because she believed that without the help of professionals, she would not survive in a dispute with her ex-lover. Since Gibson started the conflict, he must pay for everything, says Grigorieva.

In turn, the actor's lawyers insist that some of Oksana's demands are unnecessary. For example, she demands to pay for the services of bodyguards, although Lucia is still too young to walk without her mother.

Last week, Grigorieva went to court with a request to increase the amount that the actor pays for the maintenance of 10-month-old Lucia. Now the star daddy gives out 5 thousand dollars a month. But in addition to the maintenance of the baby, Gibson also pays for the house in which Grigorieva lives. But the girl believes that the indicated amount is too small, and asks to increase it almost 10 times - up to 40 thousand.

TMZ notes that at the same time, the pianist receives $ 2,500 from her boyfriend, another Hollywood actor, Timothy Dalton, to support their 13-year-old son Alexander, and the judge is unlikely to decide that a 9-month-old child can demand 16 times more money than a teenager. However, the judge has not yet been able to make any decision and postponed the hearing in the case.

Recommended: