What is female logic from the point of view of a man

2024 Author: James Gerald | [email protected]. Last modified: 2023-12-17 14:00

Turgenev wrote: "A man can say that twice two is not four, but five or three and a half, and a woman will say that twice two is a stearin candle." And what is typical - a woman is able to convince any man of this. More precisely, to make him agree with her. Transferring a conversation to another plane is one of the basic principles of female logic. A man transmits information - a woman transmits emotions. The man says that there is no money yet for a fur coat, the woman says that she is not loved.

Female logic does not care about abstractions; it always has a specific subject of application. Unlike the male, it is multidimensional. By definition, it is impossible to defeat the female logic of the male one: the latter does not take into account the mood of the disputants, the tear in the voice, tears and the end of the dispute with the wording: "Maybe you are speaking correctly, but I am also right in my own way."

The goal of a man in a dispute is to prove a statement, a goal of a woman in a dispute is to insist on her own.

“In my own way, too, I’m right” as a special case “I’m always right,” in general, can be safely placed as an epigraph in any textbook on women's logic.

By the way, remember the anecdote about the two books on the table? One is small and thin, the other is a hefty volume. On the spine of the first there is an inscription: “Male logic”, on the spine of the second: “Female logic. Volume 1.

Women's logic is much freer than men's. Only a woman in the process of an argument can radically change her point of view, completely sincerely not noticing this. And end the dialogue with the words: “Well, you finally understand. That's what I wanted to say right from the start!"

The principle of "the third is not given" female logic sweeps aside completely, not noticing. Given both the third and the compote.

The goal of a man in a dispute is to prove a statement, a goal of a woman in a dispute is to insist on her own.

The strength of a woman's arguments is not in their truth, but in the quantity and manner of presentation. The phrase: "You will appreciate the beauty of the game" - just about that. By the middle of a dispute, a woman may generally forget how it all began, and for what reason the spears are rushing about. The global goal was to find out who is right "in principle", and not on the issue under discussion, which is no longer interesting to anyone.

A man in a dispute with a woman is untenable to such an extent that he is not always even able to understand who, in fact, won in him (for women, by the way, this is not a question at all).

Several years ago Dmitry Beklemishev, a professor at the Moscow Institute of Physics and Technology, wrote an invaluable work entitled Notes on Women's Logic (I highly recommend it), which, among other things, defines the criteria by which this can somehow be determined.

1. A statement without objection is proven.

Moreover, it does not matter at all for whatever reasons there was no objection. For example, if you express 5 - 10 judgments in a row at a high speed, then we can say with confidence that some of them will remain unanswered. An excellent rule that is very often used …

2. Whoever has the last word wins the whole dispute completely.

For this reason, women's objections are almost always directed against the last statement of the opponent.

It is impossible to win an argument with a woman; it is better not to enter into a discussion or immediately admit defeat.

3. In feminine logic, every statement can be not only refuted, but also rejected.

Rejecting the statement, you recognize it as meaningless and ignore it.

This is awesome, in fact! After all, any argument, no matter how strong, instantly shrinks from the thrown in response "So what?" "So what?" is a universal counterargument. It's practically a weapon! On unprepared men, you can generally go exclusively with him! And admire the way the unfortunate man tries to break it through, foaming at his mouth.

By the way, the repetition of the same argument by a woman in a dispute strengthens its probative power! Another amazing thing. In the field of male logic, there is no such thing. And rightly so, because if a man decides to use this technique, he will immediately receive in response: "Well, what are you doing the same thing!" And after all, a woman will be right in this from all points of view, even the victim himself admits this.

Another significant difference in women's logic: many judgments directly depend on what goals the woman is currently pursuing. Take, for example, brown shoes bought three months ago.

Situation number 1. New shoes have been found that are much more pleasant than the ones we have.

Sample text: “Darling, my old shoes are almost four months old. They are from the previous collection and are out of fashion. Everyone we know has ten pairs of shoes, only I'm like Cinderella. Let's buy new shoes."

Situation number 2. Found a handbag and skirt to match our brown shoes perfectly.

Sample text: “Darling, I want to thank you again for those wonderful shoes we bought last month. I am delighted! Now in the same store a handbag and a skirt are sold for them. Let's buy!"

The shoes are the same. In both cases, the woman spoke sincerely, from the heart, as they say. Only in one case are the shoes old and practically discarded. In the second, they have just been bought and are beautiful.

Beklemishev believes that one of the differences between feminine logic and masculine logic is that it is always applied to a dispute. I disagree. Sometimes the processes take place "for the sake of art."

The best answer to this is:

	Women are also right in their own way
	So what?
	The author doesn't like us at all
	Well, what did he do the same thing?

A man sits at a table, quickly typing something on the computer. The work of thought is clearly written on the face. A woman comes up, looks at him expectantly, sighs … The man turns to her with a questioning expression on his face. “I'm disturbing you? Well, okay … , - says the woman and leaves …

In my opinion, a great example of the use of female logic - for the soul …

And finally, a few words for men.

The phrase "You don't love me at all!" almost never requires an answer "Well, where did you get that? !!" The woman who pronounces it wants to get extra attention, gentle words and maybe help …

It is impossible to win an argument with a woman; it is better not to enter into a discussion or immediately admit defeat.